Litigation

Litigation

In an effort to assert the AVT patent, Advanced Video Technologies LLC seven patent infringement lawsuits, all of which were settled with most of the plaintiffs taking licenses under the AVT Patent:

Advanced Video Technologies LLC v. Pure Digital Technologies, Inc. (1:08-cv-03627) was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2008. The case was settled with the defendants taking a license under the AVT Patent.

Advanced Video Technologies LLC v. Audiovox Corporation and Audiovox Electronics Corporation (1:09-cv-04516) was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2009. The case was settled with the defendants taking a license under the AVT Patent.

Advanced Video Technologies LLC v. Aiptek, Inc. USA et al. (1:10-cv-09013) was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2010. The case was settled with the defendants taking a license under the AVT Patent.

Advanced Video Technologies LLC v. HTC Corporation, HTC (B.V.I.) Corp., HTC America, Inc., and Exedea, Inc. (1:2011cv06604) was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2011. The case was settled with the plaintiffs taking licenses under the AVT Patent.

Advanced Video Technologies LLC v. Research in Motion Ltd. and Research in Motion Corporation (1:2011cv08908) was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2011. The case was settled with the defendants taking a license under the AVT Patent.

Advanced Video Technologies LLC v. Motorola Mobility, Inc. (1:2012cv00918) was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2012. The case was settled with the defendants taking a license under the AVT Patent.

Advanced Video Technologies LLC v. Casio America, Inc. and Casio Computer Co., Ltd. (2:09-cv-05220) was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in 2009. The case was settled with the defendants taking a license under the AVT Patent.